Back to the list

Brazil security forces who shot dead 14-year-old schoolboy must face justice, says UN expert 

GENEVA (30 July 2018) – 

A UN human rights expert is calling for “prompt, thorough, independent and impartial investigations” into the death of a 14-year-old schoolboy following a security operation jointly conducted on 20 June by the army and police in the Maré favela complex in Rio de Janeiro.Marcos Vinicius da Silva, who was wearing his school uniform and was on his way home from school, died in hospital after he was shot in the stomach. The operation involved the deployment of helicopters, which flew over the Maré complex and fired shots. A total of seven people were reportedly killed.“A young child’s life was cut short seemingly for no other reasons than where he lived and for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. His killing violates all the principles that should guide the use of lethal force, whether by the police or military. I wish to extend my sincere condolences to his family and friends,” said the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Agnes Callamard.“The Brazilian authorities must ensure that those responsible are brought to justice, and that full reparation, including compensation, is made to the child’s family, as appropriate.” Ms Callamard expressed concern at the militarisation of policing operations in Brazil, and at national legislation making it possible for military courts to investigate and try intentional killings of civilians committed by agents of the armed forces. She stressed that the military justice system should try only members of the military accused of crimes that are of an exclusively military nature, or breaches of military discipline.The expert on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions also expressed concern about the legitimate defence reform proposal currently under consideration by the Brazilian Senate’s Commission on Constitution, Justice and Citizenship. Under the proposal, self-defence would be presumed in any case where a public security officer kills or injures anyone illegally carrying a restricted-use firearm.“This proposal carries the risk of creating a legal presumption of legitimate defence in all cases when public security agents kill or injure those who carry firearms of restricted use anywhere and at anytime,” the expert said.“Only in exceptional circumstances should State officials be able to claim self-defence, or defence of others, as a justification for their decision to use force. If it is possible to avoid the threat without resorting to force, then law enforcement must use alternative non-violent and non-lethal methods.“I urge the authorities not only to bring to justice those responsible for the death of this child, Marcos Vinicius da Silva, but also to ensure that relevant national legislation is in line with international human rights law and standards,” the expert emphasised.ENDS 

Адвокат, оказываю высококвалифицированную юридическую помощь в соответствии с законами. За многолетний опыт работы выработал свой, уникальный подход к работе с клиентами.

Заголовок

Вы можете выбрать стиль текста, его начертание и цвет

Social Networks

 

­­­­

© 2018 INHR (Registered with the UNITED NATIONS­­ / DESA) 

Office 1